Template:Did you know nominations/Extreme mass ratio inspiral

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 23:58, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Extreme mass ratio inspiral

edit

Created/expanded by TimothyRias (talk). Self nom at 15:46, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

  • New enough, long enough, neutral, no sign of copyvio, hook is given in article and in cited source, well sourced. The article relies mostly on one source, but given the authors and the journal, that is not a significant issue. There is no overview, and no need for one. I would be inclined to drop the "Overview" heading, and replace the L3 "Scientific potential" heading by an L2 "Significance" heading. And drop the "expand section" template - it does not need expansion. Good to go. Aymatth2 (talk) 19:14, 30 November 2012 (UTC)