Template:Did you know nominations/Enoch Marvin Banks

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 02:50, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Enoch Marvin Banks

(

)

Banks' staff portrait in 1911

... that Enoch Marvin Banks (pictured) resigned from the University of Florida because of public outrage over his belief that the Civil War was caused by slavery? Source: Bailey, Fred Arthur (1992). "Free Speech at the University of Florida: The Enoch Marvin Banks Case". The Florida Historical Quarterly. 71 (1): 1–17 – via JSTOR.
- ALT1: ... that Enoch Marvin Banks' (pictured) 1911 refutation of the Lost Cause of the Confederacy triggered so much public outrage that he was forced to resign his professorship? Source: Bailey, Fred Arthur (1992). "Free Speech at the University of Florida: The Enoch Marvin Banks Case". The Florida Historical Quarterly. 71 (1): 1–17 – via JSTOR.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Rick Rehm

Created by ThadeusOfNazereth (talk). Self-nominated at 18:56, 15 November 2022 (UTC).

Reviewing... Hydrangeans (she/her | talk | edits) 01:33, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Looks like everything's in order! The hook is interesting, it's cited, the article is new enough and long enough, claims in the article have citations, and the sources warrant the information. Earqig detected 13% resemblance to the History News Network source, but I think that's because you both it and the Wikipedia page quote the same passage from Banks's paper, or maybe because the southern heritage organizations both mention have long names. And it looks like you've already reviewed another nomination. Congrats, and you're good to go! Hydrangeans (she/her | talk | edits) 01:53, 19 November 2022 (UTC)