Template:Did you know nominations/Emily Williamson

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Allen3 talk 13:30, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Emily Williamson, Eliza Phillips

edit

Created/expanded by Tom Morris (talk). Nominated by Gobonobo (talk) at 10:15, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

  • New enough and long enough at the time of nomination. No images to check copyright on. Both are neutral enough. Hook is properly formatted.
  • Paywall sources and offline sources support text.
  • Emily Williamson and Eliza Phillips both have fact tags that need clearing as the articles are not fully supported by inline sources.
  • Hooked fact not supported by sources in Emily article. Use of word barbaric is not in text and seems POVish given not appearing in article. --LauraHale (talk) 20:59, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Fully source both articles. Address issues with hook. --LauraHale (talk) 20:59, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

  • The paraphrasing from the ODNB in the Williamson article is too close for my liking and may require a rewrite, so I'm withdrawing the nomination. Gobōnobō + c 01:09, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn by the nominator due to paraphrasing issues. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:07, 19 November 2012 (UTC)