Template:Did you know nominations/Elizabeth Dilling

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:03, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Elizabeth Dilling edit

Elizabeth Dilling
Elizabeth Dilling

Improved to Good Article status by Signedzzz (talk). Self-nominated at 22:32, 4 July 2016 (UTC).

  • Recently promoted to GA status. No close paraphrasing or neutrality issues detected. However, the hook is not in the article at all. I see bits and pieces of it from the article itself mainly in the note section but no direct reference to it or a direct source for the hook. KAVEBEAR (talk) 20:03, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
  • KAVEBEAR the Einstein part is in the 3rd paragraph of the Anti-communism section, and the Hitler part is in the 2nd footnote. Both referenced. zzz (talk) 20:08, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
  • I can accept the Einstein part but the Hitler part is only in a footnote, so I am not sure if that is within policy for hook if there not in the main content. Third opinion? KAVEBEAR (talk) 20:14, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

@KAVEBEAR: The rules are at WP:DYK and WP:DYKSG. There are none about footnotes. zzz (talk) 21:59, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Ok, I see no good reasons to deny this other than my opinion. AGF. Good to go. KAVEBEAR (talk) 23:20, 6 July 2016 (UTC)