- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 10:19, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Elisabeth Griffith
5x expanded by Cielquiparle (talk) and created by Turktimex3 (talk). Self-nominated at 11:15, 19 November 2022 (UTC).
Review in process
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
QPQ: 
- Not done
Overall: Article was 5x expanded within the last seven days, it's long enough, it has the sources it needs and the hook does too, and I think the hook is rather interesting, though it's more about Griffith's book than herself. I'll assume good faith for the paywalled New York Times article, and the other citations are verified. All that's left is the Quid Pro Quo review, so let me know when that's ready. P-Makoto (talk) 01:23, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks @P-Makoto:! Have added link to QPQ above. Cielquiparle (talk) 09:25, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Perfect! Hook is good to go. Good faith presumed for paywalled NYT article; all others verified. P-Makoto (talk) 16:31, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
- Not done
Article was 5x expanded within the last seven days, it's long enough, it has the sources it needs and the hook does too, and I think the hook is rather interesting, though it's more about Griffith's book than herself. I'll assume good faith for the paywalled New York Times article, and the other citations are verified. All that's left is the Quid Pro Quo review, so let me know when that's ready. P-Makoto (talk) 01:23, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
