Template:Did you know nominations/El Castillo del Terror (2000, 2002)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 10:22, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

El Castillo del Terror (2000), El Castillo del Terror (2002)

edit

Created by MPJ-DK (talk). Self-nominated at 23:17, 6 July 2016 (UTC).

  • Review under way Hook is too long. 213 characters. 7&6=thirteen () 17:32, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Partial Review 2000 El Castillo del Terror has dead link and at least one uncited paragraph. No references for the "annual"ness of the event, which is central to the hook as submitted. I also hate (not too strong a word) this hook. It is repetitive in the extreme (brought to you by the Department of Redundancy and Needless Repetition), cumbersome, over long, and boring. Suggest we get a better hook, clean up the links and get rid of the templates. I have not yet looked at 2002 7&6=thirteen () 18:21, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
  • I guess we have a different bar for "extremely boring", have you seen the 70 article hook I suggested? That was extreme, this is just run-of-the-mill vanilla ;-) the link worked when I accessed it on my phone, but on my PC it looks empty, let me see what I can figure out about that. And I got sources for each year, I'll work something out for that one. Problem with "multi article" hooks (which I was strongly encouraged to do) is that there are very few facts they have in common.  MPJ-DK  21:33, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Source replaced, other sources added.  MPJ-DK  21:43, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Maybe if I did not ram "El Castillo" down everyone's throat a couple of times it would work better. So something like the suggestion below.  MPJ-DK  21:56, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Review New enough. Timely nominated. Long enough. QPQs confirmed (done, but not yet promoted. Not a requirement.) Every paragraph is cited. In line references confirm hook. I did not have access to some of the sources (particularly the books) and WP:AGF, which should suffice. I prefer ALT1. If a sexier hook comes up (it's hard to do these with multiple articles), I'd be pleased to take a look. Earwig gives them a 0% and 2%, respectively, but I presume Earwig doesn't compare to Spanish articles. GTG. 7&6=thirteen () 22:10, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Review of El Castillo del Terror (2002)
  • No issues found with article, ready for human review.
    • This article is new and was created on 22:40, 01 July 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 3862 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • The probability of copyright violation is 2.0%. (confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
Review of El Castillo del Terror (2000)
  • No issues found with article, ready for human review.
    • This article is new and was created on 22:37, 01 July 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 5257 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • The probability of copyright violation is 0.0%. (confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
General comments

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 01:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

  • [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] - I think since the bot put diffent icons than the "Check" mark you would have to add the AGFtick to the bottom of the article for the bots to corretly pick it up?  MPJ-DK  16:06, 9 July 2016 (UTC)