Template:Did you know nominations/Edith A. Roberts

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:00, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Edith A. Roberts, Elsa Rehmann edit

Created by Surtsicna (talk). Self-nominated at 16:30, 9 June 2018 (UTC).

  • Edith A. Roberts: article created 8 June; article exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; a spot check on sourcing showed no problems and I detected no copyright violations;
  • Elsa Rehmann article creared 7 June; article exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout; there is only one source (which I don't have access to) but it is reliable and I will AGF on sourcing and copyright violations;
  • Hook The first plant laboratory is cited in the Roberts article/ Though it is not explicitly stated in the Rehmann article that she was inspired by Roberts' work I think the connection between the plant laboratory and Rehmann's later use of plant communities is clear enough. AGf on both sources as they are offline. Hook is interesting enough for me and is within the length limit. I would consider trimming it slightly by removing "'s idea" from after Rehmann's name. QPQs have been completed - Dumelow (talk) 09:27, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Dumelow, will you be completing this review? Reviews are not complete until an icon has been given, whether an approval or an indication that more work needs to be done. The icons are in explained just above the editing window. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:12, 20 June 2018 (UTC)