Template:Did you know nominations/Dinakaran Attack Case

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Alex ShihTalk 04:28, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Dinakaran Attack Case edit

Created by Evano1van (talk). Self nominated at 08:21, 23 July 2013 (UTC).

  • The article requires good copyediting. Also lead needs to be expanded to include all key points. I will do some editing now. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:46, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
I've done some additional copyediting; the prose is still a bit awkward in places, but I think it's passable now. I don't think the hook should try to explain the reason for the attack, it's not something that can be easily summed up in a few words. How about this:
DoctorKubla (talk) 08:17, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination needs full DYK review. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:57, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
  • New Enough, long enough (5,400 characters), no QPQ necessary (first nomination), cited appropriately (Dup detector on three sources, check of 5 sentences, and Copyvio check all showed clean and no close paraphrasing), seems NPOV. I did some copy-editing, and think (with DoctorKubla) that prose is good enough. Hook I agree with the good doctor that ALT1 is better. ALT1 is interesting, under 200 words, and seems sure to stay away from any NPOV concerns of living persons. ALT1 approved. Welcome to DYK Evano. AbstractIllusions (talk) 22:01, 23 August 2013 (UTC)