Template:Did you know nominations/David Pendleton

Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination  The following is an archived discussion of David Pendleton's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination's (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the DYK WikiProject's (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 10:35, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

David Pendleton

edit

Created/expanded by RightCowLeftCoast (talk). Self nom at 01:04, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

One additional note, article subject's birthday is the 2nd of February.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 01:14, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Article date and length check out, and I saw no evidence of copyright violations. BLP tags are on the talk page. The length of the hook just squeaks by - I make it 199 characters, or 203 with the ellipses. :) The article is well-written and well-referenced, so no problems there. And the hook citations are all fine. The review requirement is also completed. So no problems, basically. Also, I don't really think the categories that Aboutmovies added are significant enough contributions to warrant a DYK credit. Shame this didn't make it in time for the subject's birthday. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 16:32, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Would it be possible to hold it off until 2013? Say advance pre-approvement?--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Since this is 2013, I'm guessing you mean 2014. And it can't be held that long: six weeks is the usual maximum, so this will be promoted soon. Also, removed the AboutMovies credit; such credits are for significant edits to the content, not for category additions. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:42, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
OK.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)