- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Cult of Chucky edit
- ... that Cult of Chucky (2017) marks the first time in twenty-seven years that Alex Vincent returns to the Child's Play franchise in a principal role, as Andy Barclay? Source: MovieWeb [1]
- ALT1:... that Cult of Chucky (2017) marks the first time in twenty-seven years that Alex Vincent returns to the Child's Play franchise in a principal role? Source: MovieWeb [2]
- ALT2:... that Alex Vincent's role in Cult of Chucky (2017) is his first principal role in the franchise since Child's Play 2 (1990)? Source: MovieWeb [3]
Created by DarthBotto (talk). Self-nominated at 13:11, 9 January 2017 (UTC).
- Would I be able to receive input for this DYK nomination, please? DARTHBOTTO talk•cont 01:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- The plot section needs to be rewritten, not copied verbatim from the source.
- @Feminist: I didn't copy-paste the original premise, but in order to avoid that interpretation, I've taken the liberty of rewriting the section and removing fluff components that could be taken as advertising. How does it look now? DARTHBOTTO talk•cont 05:56, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. feminist 08:09, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: None required. |
Overall: 
All three hooks essentially mean the same. I'll leave the choice to the set builder. feminist 05:07, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
after rewritten plot section. Still a bit close for comfort but understandable because there isn't really a way to rewrite such factual information. feminist 08:09, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
