Template:Did you know nominations/Cockstock Incident

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:25, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Cockstock Incident

(

)

... that an argument over a horse led to a law banning all black settlers from Oregon in 1844?Thomas C. Mcclintock's article "James Saules, Peter Burnett, and the Oregon Black Exclusion Law of June 1844" in The Pacific Northwest Quarterly Vol. 86, No. 3 (Summer, 1995), pp. 121-130, writes on page 129, "That the white settlers feared free blacks would precipitate Indian trouble is unquestionable... that the fear... produced the exclusion law... is supported by later events."
ALT1:... that fears of a Native American uprising likely led Oregon's provisional government to ban all black settlers in 1844? Source: Same as the first hook.

Created by Owlsmcgee (talk). Self-nominated at 23:28, 30 July 2017 (UTC).

Note that I reviewed the DYK for Dewey Readmore Books. Owlsmcgee (talk) 22:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

I corrected some spelling errors and added a missing word to one of the hooks. Daniel Case (talk) 19:40, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

New enough, long enough, policy things look good. Hook's format is correct, the fact is cited in the article and neutral, and really interesting (I'd pick the first one, since it's more intriguing). QPQ is done and already promoted. --Hameltion (talk, contribs) 23:01, 7 August 2017 (UTC)