Template:Did you know nominations/Chinthamani Ragoonatha Chary

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Redtigerxyz Talk 16:19, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Chinthamani Ragoonatha Chary

edit

Created/expanded by Ravichandar84 (talk). Self nom at 13:32, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Hook review
Format Citation Neutrality Interest
Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 17:21, 18 September 2011 (UTC) Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 17:21, 18 September 2011 (UTC) Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 17:21, 18 September 2011 (UTC) Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 17:21, 18 September 2011 (UTC)


Article review
Length Newness Adequate
citations
Formatted
citations
Reliable
sources
Neutrality Plagiarism
Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 17:21, 18 September 2011 (UTC) Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 17:21, 18 September 2011 (UTC) Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 17:21, 18 September 2011 (UTC) Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 17:21, 18 September 2011 (UTC) Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 17:21, 18 September 2011 (UTC)


  • According to this the paper that this article is mostly based on was accepted into a journal. I think it would be good to have details of that publication (page numbers, issue number, journal name etc.) in the citation if at all possible. It's just a re-assurance that we've got a reliable source.
The sentence about the solar eclipse looks a bit too similar to the phrasing used in the source. Otherwise, it looks good. Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 17:21, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Paraphrasing seems okay to me. (Check). I will deal with the reference myself. AGF based on above review. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:07, 22 September 2011 (UTC)