Template:Did you know nominations/Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:12, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital

(

)

... that the United States Supreme Court case of Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital held that agencies cannot promulgate retroactive rules without express authorization by Congress? Source: "...a statutory grant of legislative rulemaking authority will not, as a general matter, be understood to encompass the power to promulgate retroactive rules unless that power is conveyed by Congress in express terms." (Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital, 488 U.S. 204 (1988) at 208.)

Reviewed: Tel Qiri

Created by Ergo Sum (talk). Self-nominated at 05:28, 15 April 2019 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

Imzadi 1979 → 05:06, 25 April 2019 (UTC)