Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Malvern Hill

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:41, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Battle of Malvern Hill edit

5x expanded by Ceradon (talk). Self nominated at 23:20, 3 January 2015 (UTC).

  • Expanded 5x, easily long enough. Article is well-written, and I have no reason to doubt the veracity of the numerous sources employed. Hook's fine length-wise (I'd go with the first one), and cited (see §5.4). QPQ all sorted, all images are public domain, as you'd expect on a 19th-century topic. Brilliant work, @Ceradon:, it's certainly no mean feat to expand a ten-year-old article fivefold, let alone to this sort of standard, and you should definitely considering taking it to GAN, at a minimum. (For what it's worth, I discovered quite recently that Thomas Cocke, who built the original Malvern Hill, is a very, very distant ancestor of mine, which is why this article leapt out at me.) IgnorantArmies 16:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
  • @IgnorantArmies:, thank you for your kind works . Ancestor built the Malvern house? Wow! I want to visit the battlefield someday. Though I think the Malvern house has been destroyed or something like that, no? In regards to the GA, well, yeah: I have nominated it for GA already. You're free to check that out (review it even ) but I'm trying to get it to FA before July 1. At that point, I'll be able to nominate it for TFA. I'm gonna take this one far. Thanks, --ceradon (talkcontribs) 23:23, 4 January 2015 (UTC)