- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:59, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Battle of Cana edit
- ... that after Seleucid king Antiochus XII was slain by the Nabataeans during the Battle of Cana, his demoralized army fled and died from starvation in the desert?
Created by Makeandtoss (talk). Self-nominated at 13:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC).
- Fixed source 2. Makeandtoss (talk) 19:24, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, now I can see all 3 sources, I'm wondering where "Although the balance of the events in the battle was tipped towards a victory for the Seleucids, Antiochus was slain by an Arab soldier during combat and the battle became a decisive Nabataean victory." comes from. The first bit is also repeated in the article, and not very idiomatic English, so might be dropped. Johnbod (talk) 02:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- Its in the second source. Makeandtoss (talk) 10:26, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- That says they were "set to win" the campaign, until the battle. Not the same. Johnbod (talk) 10:46, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- "Killed in action" makes it sound as the campaign. Makeandtoss (talk) 10:55, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- No that sounds like the battle, given the other sources. But this source (2) doesn't mention the battle at all, just the campaign, so you can't source the dramatic turn-around in the battle the article describes to her. Johnbod (talk) 01:38, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- Fixed issues. Makeandtoss (talk) 18:16, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Johnbod: Makeandtoss (talk) 08:59, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- No that sounds like the battle, given the other sources. But this source (2) doesn't mention the battle at all, just the campaign, so you can't source the dramatic turn-around in the battle the article describes to her. Johnbod (talk) 01:38, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- "Killed in action" makes it sound as the campaign. Makeandtoss (talk) 10:55, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- That says they were "set to win" the campaign, until the battle. Not the same. Johnbod (talk) 10:46, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- Its in the second source. Makeandtoss (talk) 10:26, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, now I can see all 3 sources, I'm wondering where "Although the balance of the events in the battle was tipped towards a victory for the Seleucids, Antiochus was slain by an Arab soldier during combat and the battle became a decisive Nabataean victory." comes from. The first bit is also repeated in the article, and not very idiomatic English, so might be dropped. Johnbod (talk) 02:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
