- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:41, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Barnes Brook edit
- ... that Barnes Brook lacked any habitats for fish in 2001, but is now being considered for addition to the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission's list of wild trout streams?
- ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
Moved to mainspace by Jakob Coles (talk). Self-nominated at 21:28, 7 January 2018 (UTC).
Hi Jakob Coles, review follows: article created and moved to mainspace 7 January; article is of a good length; article is well written and cited to reliable sources throughout; no close paraphrasing or copyright violation found; hook is interesting, cited in the article and checks out to cited sources; QPQ has been done. I would suggest this is posted before 22 January when the meeting will take place to assess its addition to the list of wild trout streams (otherwise the hook will have to change, depending on the outcome) - Dumelow (talk) 09:29, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
