Template:Did you know nominations/Australian raven

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 03:57, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Australian raven

edit

Australian raven, Perth

Improved to Good Article status by Casliber (talk). Self nominated at 01:44, 24 October 2014 (UTC).

  • A fine article, well-written, with good references, informative and comprehensive, at least in the eyes of the non-expert. GA status is verified, QPQ is done, image is appropriate and licensed, the hooks are referenced (AGF on the offline source), but there is a minor problem: the article references the A. raven as "a common bird in Canberra, Sydney and Perth;", not necessarily, as in the first hook, as the "commonest crow-like bird". This is implied to some extent by the following sentence in the article, but is not clear and should be fixed. Otherwise it is good to go. Constantine 15:29, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Oh thats the lead - see para 2 of the Distribution and habitat - I tweaked it a little to clarify. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:22, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Hmmm, the problem is in the preceding sentence, about Canberra, Sydney and Perth, not the one you edited. It should say explicitly that it is the most common corvid in these three cities. Constantine 10:08, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • OK then, ready to go! Once again, well done, and good luck with the FAC! Constantine 21:27, 27 October 2014 (UTC)