Template:Did you know nominations/Asplenium tutwilerae

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 12:54, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Asplenium tutwilerae edit

Created/expanded by Choess (talk). Self nom at 02:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

  • Article length and date ok, all hooks of acceptable length. No problems with close paraphrasing. Original hook can't be used yet, as the article does not explicitly say that Julia Tutwiler was a prison reformer. ALT1 confirmed, but the phrase "classified with" might be confusing; the average reader will probably not know that means "was considered the same species as". ALT2 confirmed. Of these three, I think the original hook is the most interesting. As a perhaps more accessible version of ALT1, how about:
ALT3: ... that although discovered in 1873, Tutwiler's spleenwort was not considered a distinct species until 2007?

or maybe

ALT4: ... that, originally discovered in 1873, Tutwiler's spleenwort became one of the world's rarest ferns in 2007?
this last one leaves some mystery as to why it all of a sudden became so rare. Sasata (talk) 06:48, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
I've added a source to the article for Tutwiler's occupations, so the original hook should now be OK. Choess (talk) 00:54, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
  • All hooks now verified. Sasata (talk) 04:12, 4 July 2012 (UTC)