Template:Did you know nominations/Anna Apostolaki

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 07:47, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Anna Apostolaki

  • ... that Anna Apostolaki, the first Greek woman to work as a professional archaeologist, was also a feminist educator who promoted women's traditional crafts? Sources: "Nikolaidou, Marianna; Kokkinidou, Dimitra (2005). "Greek women in archaeology: an untold story". In Díaz-Andreu, Margarita; Sørensen, Marie Louise Stig (eds.). Excavating Women: A History of Women in European Archaeology. Abingdon-on-Thames, England: Routledge, p. 235; Allman, Naomi (2021). "Anna Apostolaki". TrowelBlazers. Retrieved 26 August 2021.

Improved to Good Article status by Eritha (talk). Self-nominated at 11:26, 9 September 2021 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

  • Adequate sourcing: Yes
  • Neutral: Yes
  • Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: No - Earwig picks up some similarities with the TrowelBlazers post (which is cited as a source). Some of these are quotes or titles and don't give rise to concerns, but out of an abundance of caution I think "the first woman to work professionally in the field of archaeology in Greece" and "was particularly interested in increasing the visibility of [women's participation in society]" should be rephrased. For the first one, I'd suggest replacing with the wording used in the hooks ("the first Greek woman to work as a professional archeologist"). Earwig also picks up similarities with this article but having reviewed these I can't spot any concerns.
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Article is new enough (promoted to GA on 8 September) and long enough. Well-cited (as would be expected for a GA). I think both hooks are good and interesting. QPQ not required as the user has only 2 existing DYK credits. It's a really great article on an interesting subject, well done. The only points are the similarities with the sources noted above, which I'd hope would be easy to rework. @Eritha: please ping me once this has been done. Chocmilk03 (talk) 22:28, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for flagging those up @Chocmilk03:! I've rewritten both of those sentences slightly, hope it looks ok now! Eritha (talk) 06:57, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

  • Thanks, good to go! Cheers, Chocmilk03 (talk) 09:45, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
To T:DYK/P5