Template:Did you know nominations/Allegory of Fortune

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 18:52, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Allegory of Fortune edit

(

)

... that Allegory of Fortune (detail pictured) almost got its painter jailed and excommunicated?

Reviewed: Beer, Beer, Beer

Created by Sagaciousphil (talk), Hafspajen (talk). Nominated by Mandarax (talk) at 22:04, 26 February 2015 (UTC). File:Adam Elsheimer - Saint Paul.jpg

Date and length hook OK. AGF on offline source. No close para, QPQ done, picture licence fine. Good to go. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 10:40, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Note that the image was promoted to featured picture status a couple of days ago. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 22:23, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Is there any way to lighten the image? It's really hard to see at 100px. Yoninah (talk) 22:04, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

NO. Image is Featured picture, and it has the right kind of sources, sghowing it does look like this. Hafspajen (talk) 22:23, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Also the painter lived in the Barock era, and lots and lots of his paintings are dark. We don't manipulate paintings because it is a featured picture criteria. Hafspajen (talk) 22:26, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Also, Baroque art is characterized by dramatic, deep dark and rich, colouring with intense highlights, and very very dark shadows, like The Nightwatch by Rembrandt , Francesco Trevisani - Apollo and Daphne , and such.Hafspajen (talk) 22:38, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

The trend is called Chiaroscuro, and we will not lighten paintings or manipulate them in any way. Hafspajen (talk) 22:53, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

A lot of paintings are difficult to use at 100px. Perhaps a detail could be created, just for the nom? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:12, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Can you do that= ? Hafspajen (talk) 01:08, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Added detail. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:01, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Well, problem hopefully solved then, thanks. Hafspajen (talk) 19:54, 10 March 2015 (UTC)