Template:AfC reject/testcases

Main version

• {{AfC reject|Example}}

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help.

• {{AfC reject|reason=n}}

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Primefac was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

• {{AfC reject|Example|reason=e}}

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Primefac was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

• {{AfC reject|Example|reason=e|comment=foo}}

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Primefac was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: foo

• {{AfC reject|Example|reason=e|reason2=n|comment=foo}}

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Primefac were: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: foo

• {{AfC reject|Example|reason=e|comment=foo|sig=y}}

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Primefac was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: foo

~~~~