Talk:Zunafish

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

A website that has launched into the public consiousness is worthy of description in Wikipedia. By virtue of the following press mentions...

--Full-page story in the National Edition of the New York Times --Profiled in the print edition of TIME Magazine --Named one of TIME's 50 Coolest Websites 2005 --One of PC Magazine's "Top Sites" of 2006

...the site has become widely known and of general interest to the online community, and the site's origins, corporate headquartering and brief history are a potential source of inquiry.

In addition, this article, which has been only slightly edited and generally remains in its original form, has survived review editing by multiple Wikipedia editors over the past year.

The minor additions in no way justify deletion of this article.

(the following relates edits by the story's author and Wikipedia editors over the last year):

(cur) (last) 15:25, 17 February 2007 24.63.216.44 (Talk) (cur) (last) 15:17, 17 February 2007 Cocoaguy (Talk | contribs) (cur) (last) 15:17, 17 February 2007 24.63.216.44 (Talk) (cur) (last) 15:16, 17 February 2007 24.63.216.44 (Talk) (cur) (last) 15:15, 17 February 2007 24.63.216.44 (Talk) (cur) (last) 15:13, 17 February 2007 24.63.216.44 (Talk) (cur) (last) 10:12, 24 October 2006 24.117.151.163 (Talk) (→External links) (cur) (last) 11:42, 10 September 2006 71.192.38.245 (Talk) (cur) (last) 10:18, 19 May 2006 Ruhrfisch (Talk | contribs) (wikified) (cur) (last) 22:13, 22 April 2006 71.192.38.245 (Talk) (cur) (last) 08:03, 15 April 2006 134.10.123.206 (Talk) (cur) (last) 06:14, 14 April 2006 Pmsyyz (Talk | contribs) (initial stub)

I agree and as a result am not deleting it. However I would strongly recommend more references are added and the article rewritten in a more neutral point of view. Stifle (talk) 19:53, 17 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

The article has been revised to reflect a neutral point of view--please advise if further revisions are needed.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zunafish. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:39, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply