Talk:Zug, Western Sahara

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Comments edit

Please don't attach the following: Image:Flag-map of Western Sahara.svg (i.e. Flag of SADR) to this article. Zug is in disputed territory. Attaching the Flag of SADR is POV just as putting the Flag of Mooroco would be. Neutrality and integrity are important. Regards. Redking7 (talk) 00:32, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Okay I'm not attaching any images to the article, just the relevant template. If you have a problem with it, you should bring it up on the talk there, not here. Inserting {{Morocco-geo-stub}} is POV, as it asserts that Zug is in Morocco - it's not, whereas {{WesternSahara-geo-stub}} is simply true. -Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 05:20, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
You do attacah an image: the SADR flag. This is highly POV. I have no problem with the categorisation - I have a problem with the fact that a flag has (unnecessarily) been attached to that categorisation. As long as there is a SADR flag, that asserts Zug is in SADR, I have to balance this with the Moroccon flag or delete all flags (which would really be the best result). Redking7 (talk) 09:19, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Zug, Western Sahara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply