Talk:Zomg

"OMG" and "ZOMG" are both mentioned in Oh my god!, and I don't think Zomg really needs an entire page dedicated to itself. --BLuToRsE 03:09, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Double redirect

Please redirect to Oh My God. Thanks. --- RockMFR 22:50, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Y Done - Harryboyles 03:15, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Better redirect?

{{editprotected}} I think List of Internet slang phrases#Z would be a better target for this redirect than Oh My God, since it actually defines the term. DopefishJustin 05:37, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

I agree, so I added a template. TheBlazikenMaster 10:55, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

done. — Carl (CBM · talk) 13:46, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

zOMG

Just wanted to say that this is, as of 'Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:20 pm', the name of the game codenamed Gaia Battle. The post here proves that what I am saying is true. Being so, maybe you should put a link to the page Gaia Battle at Wikipedia.

81.84.64.96 (talk) 13:06, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

The wikipedia entry is zOMG!. I suggest a redirect to ZOMG instead of the search or wiktionary article. Gmfreak (talk) 19:00, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

zomg

zomg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.14.127.148 (talk) 17:02, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

proper target?

This page point the gentle reader to Wictionary, while ZOMG redirects to SMS language#Common abbreviations. Which is the better target? Totnesmartin (talk) 21:17, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from Yihaa5, 22 July 2011

Spam removed. The complete request and Jac16888's denial of it can be found here in the edit history. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:45, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Yihaa5 (talk) 12:51, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Not done, the above is highly promotional and does not demonstrate notability--Jac16888 ^Talk 12:55, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 8 December 2015

Add {{pp-protected}} Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:05, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Done Sarah-Jane (talk) 15:28, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Fixup a recent edit

Remove the space before {{pp-protected|small=yes}} and remove the two blank lines below it. The blank lines are harmless but the space is causing a visual artifact at the top of the body of the page. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:48, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Done BethNaught (talk) 14:35, 3 January 2016 (UTC)