Talk:Ziggurat Con
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Citations badly needed!
editThis article badly needs citations. The article claims that Amberson has been interviewed in a number of places, these would make great citations. Absent citations, major portions of this article can be deleted by any editor, turning this into a sad little stub. — Alan De Smet | Talk 15:23, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Wow this is something I wish they would of had when I was over there. I'll see what I can do to clean it up USer:FLJuJItsu 22 Sept 07
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ziggurat Con. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070507044656/http://www.toys4troops.org:80/ to http://www.toys4troops.org
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Wish to preserve this post
editAlthough, as a con, it's not major, I feel this article is relevant because it records what GIs do in a war zone for recreation,.
I have reached out on combat vet forums to try to connect to the Con Chair, as well, for added links as requested.