Talk:Yugoslav torpedo boat T4/GA1
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Krishna Chaitanya Velaga in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 02:00, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:00, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Lead and infobox; all good
- Section 1;
- Stabilimento Tecnico Triestino; I think this is not an English name, if so, put on the italics Done
- Section 2;
- Inconsistency in figures of full load displacement Done
- 320 tonnes (310 long tons); prose
- 320 t (315 long tons); infobox
- In the previous section, it is said that the requirement was "sustaining 30 knots (56 km/h) for 10 hours", here it is "980 nautical miles (1,810 km; 1,130 mi) at 16 knots (30 km/h; 18 mph)", so this satisfy the requirement. Mention it clearly.
- I'm not sure it follows.
- Inconsistency in figures of full load displacement Done
- Section 3;
- were involved in the shelling of various Italian shore-based targets known as the Bombardment of Ancona; to a general reader it creates a confusion whether the "shelling" is known as "Bombardment of Ancona" or the "shore-based targets", make it clearer Done
- 7.4% confidence, violation unlikely.
- All these comments are the same in T2's review. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:40, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, Krishna! Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:10, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:35, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: