Talk:You Can Dance/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Adabow in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:40, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
GA reviews are a good distraction from studying for exams...
Lead
editThe release is not included in the body of the article
Background
editI recommend a bit more wikifying, including Warner Bros. and the different instruments
Development
editThe transition from musical development into album art in the second paragraph is quite stiff. Break it up or smooth it out somehow.
Composition
editWouldn't the audio sample be more appropriate here?"After the first verse, the sound of keyboard is heard during the effect." - link (the?) keyboard, what you have linked to doesn't seem to be right - 'you can hear the keyboard when it is in chorus with other instruments' is the idea I took from the sentence, which doesn't sit quite right. (Or maybe I'm just reading something wrong...)Link violin"According to the sheet music published at SheetMusicPlus.com..." - is this preamble really needed?"...spanning from the notes of C5 to B♭m" now the only musical experience I have is a few months of piano lessons, but C5 and B♭m surely aren't parallel... what I'm trying to say is 'why doesn't B♭m have a number next to it?'Link middle eight.
Critical reception
editChart performance
editNot sure about these chart positions "reached a peak of 14" - shouldn't there be a 'number' before each position- you're right.
Track listing
editSource for writers and producers?- Added.
Credits and personnel
editSource?- Added.
References
editThe Washington Post is published by The Washington Post Company- Its common notion to not include the self-publishers for such cases. I was advised by the FA reviewers during promoting Madonna that publications like The New York Times, The Washington Post, BBC etc self-publish their content and hence for them adding the publisher as The New York Times Cmopany, The Washington Post Company is redundant. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:34, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Oh, and a dab link
That's it. Pretty good work, I'll place the review on hold now. Adabow (talk · contribs) 06:04, 12 November 2010 (UTC)