Talk:Yorktown campaign/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:54, 22 March 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   One minor tag to be resolved

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Link de Grasse in the lead.

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Can you add a map of the Yorktown area, preferably one that shows the location of the Battle of the Capes?

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Nice work.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:25, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! I think I've addressed your issues. Magic♪piano 17:46, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Agreed.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC)