Talk:Yeidji

Australia: Western Australia / Indigenous peoples Low‑importance

	Australia portal Yeidji is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Western Australia Kimberley

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Western Australia Kimberley, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Kimberley on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Western Australia KimberleyWikipedia:WikiProject Western Australia KimberleyTemplate:WikiProject Western Australia KimberleyWestern Australia Kimberley articles

Balanggarra ... edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Is this a more modern name for these people, some kind of umbrella term, or ... what's going on? See page 3 of this, this native title claim, etc. I've noticed this term used a lot for sources from the area (e.g. this ABC News story and this one from the Guardian. If somebody could help resolve this confusion, that would be great. Graham87 17:38, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Pinging Nishidani as the article's creator. Graham87 17:39, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Tindale and early writers drew on distinctions that once existed. Many distinct groups decimated by colonialism lost their distinct fully 'tribal' cultures, traditionalist identities and languages, amd their descendents now have recreated regional mega-identities to represent themselves particularly as demanded by the white man's land laws. It's all very complex and tabu-fraught. I know of one mention of a Balanggarra group going back to the 1840s in that area, but most of the intervening documentation refers to the other names by which their various forefathers were known as. We can't rewrite over the old names with these new ones for the simple reason that they refer to different historical realities. In any case, what is decisive here is what AIATSIS calls them, and their term in Yiiji, a variant of Yeidji.Nishidani (talk) 21:03, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic