Talk:Word formation

Active discussions
WikiProject Linguistics / Etymology / Applied Linguistics  (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Etymology Task Force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.


This article is incomprehensibly bad. Why is there no mention of derivation, which is after all the basic method of word formation? --AAikio 21:25, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Yes, there is much more to be said. Something about affixes should be added too. Malick78 (talk) 21:14, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

the hyperlink to Peter Koch is wrong User:reji justin (talk) 10:01, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Return to "Word formation" page.