Talk:Wooldoor Sockbat

Character comparison

I know that the show debuted after drawn together, but what about the monkey from Cartoon Network's "My Gym Partner's a Monkey?"

There are some similarities, but like you mentioned, the show debuted after Drawn Together, so it's impossible for him to have influenced Wooldoor's creation in any way. I suspect the monkey was based on the same general character group Wooldoor is (Stimpy, Spongebob, etc.), hence the similarities.Sandmaster 00:12, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Occupation

The Bios say that Wooldoor is a children's entertainer, but if I recall, he was only a childrens entertainer in one episode in season 3. If thats the case, we might was well add Doctor, Priest, Professor, Miracle worker, Lemonaid stand attendant, and Grocery bagger to the list, as Wooloor has also been seen as those in different episodes. I think it should be changed to Unemployed. DSMeatte 11:28, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

You could argue that given his premise as a kids' show character, that makes him a children's entertainer. But it might be better to just put it back like it was. Technically, most of them are unemployed.Raymondluxuryacht 14:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Wooldoor's full name

I was the user that added 'Jebediah' as his middle name. In episode 205 'Captain Hero's Marriage Pact', Unusually Flexible Girl refers to Wooldoor as Wooldoor Jebediah Sockbat. Althought the continuation of information is questionable, wouldnt this make it true though? UrbanDecay 04:58, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Yes, it's true. Sorry, I was reverting some subsequent vandalism and I inadvertently removed your edit too. I'll put it back.Raymondluxuryacht 05:28, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

BTW, why "Wooldoor Sockbat"? What is the origin of the name? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.141.175.152 (talk) 11:55, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:SpongeBob Square.PNG

Image:SpongeBob Square.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:07, 30 November 2007 (UTC)