Talk:Wild Arms (video game)/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Norse Am Legend in topic GA Reassessment

GA Reassessment edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

  This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.
Everything is good except the last two paragraphs in the "Wild Arms Alter Code: F" sections are completely unsourced. Please add a reference for those two paragraphs. I will correct any other copyediting/MOS problems I have seen in the article myself. MuZemike 22:46, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ive requested that all images be reduced, currently they are all over 500px in width. An ideal width really should be around 300px and both screenshots fair use needs to be more than the boilerplate satisfy fair use requirements. Salavat (talk) 02:35, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
Ah, yes. Almost forgot about the images. I'll take care of that. MuZemike 03:28, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'm going to keep this as a GA. I just removed said unsourced material, and I nominated the 2D gameplay image for deletion (which is a separate NFCC issue and has no bearing on the GA status of this article, anyway). MuZemike 21:48, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Interesting, I never knew being a WP:Good Article involved reducing the article's quality by removing/ruining pictures and a bunch of stupidly-easy-to-verify information. Good job, bro. - Norse Am Legend (talk) 22:39, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Reply