 | This article was nominated for deletion on May 22, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
Notice edit
This article should not be deleted for one reason - the same reason Wikipedia is here. Its a website, with 2,000,000 users, who might want to know more. So it is considered Encyclopedic Content Which is why we have Wikipedia in the first place!!!! USADude 19:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- This was originally deleted because there were no reliable sources. Corvus cornix 19:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
When I put up the new version, that I had backed up on my comp. there was the original site as a source... <sarcasm>Not a very reliable source, now is it...</sarcasm> USADude 21:41, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
I have added a large number of additional sources to the description of the site - and will work with USADude to keep the entry updated. things are moving fast in the virtual world space.
Valid references edit
Although I'm the editor who tagged this for speedy deletion as a reproduction of previously-deleted content, there do seem to be some valid references that might make this article work:
- http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/15/eveningnews/main2808272.shtml
- http://web.archive.org/web/20070518214630/http://news.cincypost.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070510/LIFE/705100369/1005
- http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/archive/2007/May/04/local/stories/06local.htm
- http://www.nbc4.com/news/13270477/detail.html
- Corvus cornix 19:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Population increase on whyville edit
I happen to have noticed that Whyville has has a sudden population increase. More people will probably come to Whyville if this remains in article :D. By the way, How did you ever come across this article over all of the others?
- I was reviewing WP:DRV, where the previous incarnation had been upheld as keep deleted, but there was a blue link, indicating that it had been recreated anyway. Corvus cornix 20:58, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Cleanup: tone issues edit
This article has some serious tone issues: too much emphasis on what "you" can do on the site as opposed to what the site offers "its users" for example. Another problem is the unsourced commentary: "Perhaps Whyville could release a used Scion business sometime?" Perhaps, but this sort of speculation and/or wishful thinking is not appropriate encyclopedic material. --Kinu t/c 05:33, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Lets not get into encyclopedic content issues again... USADude 18:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
UPDATE: Fixed, now i'm taking off the tag.
Numedeon edit
It seems Numedeon has made a couple edits to "clean its image" Comments2010 (talk) 02:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)