Talk:Whitney Houston (album)/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by L-l-CLK-l-l in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 19:53, 9 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    "The label, wanting Houston" use past tense not present, tense issues is an issue ongoing in the article. There are also WP:ORDINAL violations left and right. Per WP:DATE use "2010-06-01" or "May 28, 2008" not both.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    WP:LEAD there should be no references in the lead, this is because the lead should summarize the body of the article, there should be nothing in the lead that isnt in the rest of the article.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    see C
    C. No original research:  
    Alot of dead links. Personnel is unsourced, Track listing is unsourced, parts of "Promotions and appearances" in unsourced.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    See B
    B. Focused:  
    Under "Commercial performance" you talk about the singles, dont do that. Chart performance is on the Album, not the singles. Make a Singles section if you want to talk about the singles. Also, your way over detailed in parts throughout the article.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
    "In addition to its popularity, the album was praised by critics and the music industry." is biased and not neutral. There a number of issues similar to this throughout the article.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    see B
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    Japanese Addition cover fails WP:NFCC. Only one cover is needed, this image does not significantly increase readers knowledge.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  


Im sorry but i am failing this article. I suggest a peer review before nominating this article again. Concerned editors please take a look at The Fame, Animal (Kesha album) , or Confessions on a Dance Floor Thank you. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 19:53, 9 October 2010 (UTC)Reply