Talk:White Bear (Black Mirror)/GA1

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Cognissonance in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cognissonance (talk · contribs) 10:46, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Will rewatch episode tonight, and begin assessment thereafter. Cognissonance (talk) 10:46, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

5 May notes

edit

Lead

edit

Plot

edit

Production

edit

@Gabriel Yuji: Cognissonance (talk) 21:21, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

6 May notes

edit

Cultural references

edit

Themes

edit
  • Convert as many long quotations as possible into prose.
I'll handle it as soon as possible. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 16:23, 7 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Reception

edit
  • As above, so below. Convert as many long quotations as possible into prose, so as not to oversaturate the sections with them.
I'll handle it as soon as possible. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 16:23, 7 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

Overall

edit
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall: Well-done article with need for adjustment.
    Pass/Fail:  
    @Gabriel Yuji: Cognissonance (talk) 16:22, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
    My responses are above, Cognissonance. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 16:23, 7 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
    @Gabriel Yuji: Checks out. Let me know when you've paraphrased the quotes. Cognissonance (talk) 16:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
    @Cognissonance: Paraphrased some. Note sure if it's enough, though. Tell me what you think. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 02:51, 8 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
    @Gabriel Yuji: That works. I compared the use of quotations to another episode article and it's not unheard of to have many of them, as long as some opinions are paraphrased. In any case, it's good to go. Cognissonance (talk) 09:59, 8 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.