Talk:Wet (Nicole Scherzinger song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 01:10, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

I will review. I tend to make minor fixes myself instead of bothering to tell you to do it. If you are unhappy with any changes I make feel free to revert them and we will instead discuss the issue. Also please be advised this is my first GA review for an article about a song; it may be a bit of a learning curve for me. Freikorp (talk) 01:10, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

I'm passing this now. Article was very well written and layed out. I made many small changes and fixes while the nomination was open; you can see the majority of them here: [1]. Well done. Freikorp (talk) 04:26, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   I stopped checking for close paraprhasing/copyright violations after the first column of references as there were no signs of any.

   The only thing i'm still unsure of is the lead sentence "The dance-pop and pop song speak of Scherzinger singing that her body is aching for a man's touch." I don't think it's appropriate. "Aching for a man's touch" is a direct quote from one source only. Suggest complete rewording, or somehow attribute the words as a direct quote. I'm unsure of the best way to do this, so i'm going to leave it with you.

 Fixed

1. B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   Current ref 15 (UK Singles Chart) links to the current chart, not an archive featuring this song. Accordingly it doesn't back up the assertion.

   Also searching for 'Nicole Scherzinger' at said website [2] indicates the song peaked at No. 21 in the UK, contradicting the article.

 Fixed Alex ^{talk page!} 03:41, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

1. C. No original research:

2. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

3. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

4. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   No ongoing disputes since 2011, and that one has long been resolved.

5. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

6. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: