This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Oppose. I have just stumbled across this page as I was doing a bit of incidental editing about an Australian Sufi, and judging by the number of related people and topics there are out there, I would not like to see this page deleted. I think that it could be usefully kept and improved. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:56, 13 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hazrat Inayat Khan was the first sufi-master to bring sufism to the West in 1910, yet he never claimed to represent a "Western Sufism". On the contrary, his intention was clearly to unite East and West. It would be right to call him a representative of "Universal Sufism", this term including East and West. The equation of "Universal Sufism" with "Western Sufism", like it is done here, is wrong and misleading. It is limiting the masters teaching to the "West". Today the teaching of Hazrat Inayat Khan is very much alive in western and eastern countries. Lordring (talk) 21:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
