Talk:Watford (UK Parliament constituency)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Watford (UK Parliament constituency) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Untitled edit
"The constituency comprises the whole of Watford Borough Council" should read "The constituency comprises the whole of Watford Borough" shouldn't it? 62.253.80.137 21:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Conflict of interest edit
User:JoeCawley, who admits he works for Anne Main, has been tinkering with this page. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:41, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Watford (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101106204053/http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm to http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:16, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The NEXT Election? edit
Why is there a "results" table in this article for an election that hasn't happened yet? Furthermore, why does this table seem to imply that the Labour candidate has already won it? A little bit of "wishful thinking"...? Or a little bit of "cynical tinkering"....? 86.15.43.202 (talk) 14:14, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
- Presumably because the Labour party have already chosen their candidate. It makes no implication of a presumed winner, though it should be ordered alphabetically, or incumbent first then alphabetically. It does make the rash assumption however that the Next United Kingdom general election will be in the 2010s. If it annoys you, and you have good WP:NPOV reasons - WP:SOFIXIT. Cabayi (talk) 15:12, 2 February 2018 (UTC)