Talk:Washington State Route 230/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Imzadi1979 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Imzadi 1979  20:14, 18 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)

DAB and EL are good.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    I made a few minor edits, but the prose was sound.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    No issues here.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Images would be nice, but for an unbuilt road, it would be kind of impossible unless a current photo of where road would run is added or a map is created off WSDOT planning documents.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Nice job. With a few minor edits I applied, the article meets the criteria. Imzadi 1979  01:48, 19 February 2011 (UTC)Reply