Talk:Vienna Convention on Succession of States in Respect of Treaties

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article 9 edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

According to WP,

«article 9 states that all other new states may only join multilateral treaties to which their predecessor states were a part with the consent of the other parties.»

But article 9 says:

«Unilateral declaration by a successor State regarding treaties of the predecessor State

1.Obligations or rights under treaties in force in respect of a territory at the date of a succession of States do not become the obligations or rights of the successor State or of other States Parties to those treaties by reason only of the fact that the successor State has made a unilateral declaration providing for the continuance in force of the treaties in respect of its territory.

2.In such a case, the effects of the succession of States on treaties which, at the date of that succession of States, were in force in respect of the territory in question are governed by the present Convention.»

Can anybody explain it to me, because I don't get it. --80.39.227.138 (talk) 19:39, 30 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nonsense indeed. Feel free to rephrase! L.tak (talk) 21:55, 30 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic