Talk:Versus (EP)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 19:16, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Info box

• No issues.

Lead

• No need for three paragraphs here. Two will suffice.  Done
• Instead of citing that it is his first extended play in the lead, also write it and then cite it instead in the Background and composition section.  Done
• Link "Lay You Down" in the second paragraph.  Done

Background and composition

• "In an 2009 interview with People Magazine," → In a interview with People Magazine in 2009,  Done

Release and promotion

• No issues.

Release and promotion - Singles

• Songs, writers and featured artists should not be linked a second time, as they have already been linked in the two previous sections.  Done

Release and promotion - Tour

• No issues.

Reception

• No issues across any of the three sub sections.

Track listing

• No issues.

Credits and personnel

• No issues.

Charts

• I've done a slight c/e of this section. Thanks!

Release history

• You need to add a last column for the record label for that country that Usher is signed to.  Done

References

• There is overlinking. Only the work and parameter, for example Billboard, in the first citation in the article. All proceeding that first one should not be linked.  Done

Summary

Good job, on hold for 7 days.

Thanks for the review, I think all the issues have been addressed.

Passing :-) Aaron • ^{You Da One} 10:58, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·