Talk:University of Windsor/Archive
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Any other wikipedians go to the UofW?
I'm thinking this page probably needs some expansion. I'll get on it eventually, but feel free to help! CriminalSaint 01:43, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- I'm an alumnus (B.Comm, '80) so I've added the U to my watchlist. While I'm here - under Famous People there's somebody by the name of 'John Nehmetallah' listed, and I can't find much of anything about such a person. I'm inclined to delete his name. PKT 14:01, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- Looks like Mikerussell took care of Mr. Nehmetallah for us! PKT 12:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
History just copied from website?
I think the entire History section is just taken from the University's own webpage. Probably should be paraphrased. I added two photos I took while visiting the campus recently too. --Mikerussell 04:47, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
ad-copy material
Who wrote the first paragraph of the reputation section? The bias is terrible. How should we fix this? (Currently a Windsor student) -- unsigned comment was posted at 23:39, 7 March 2007 by anonymous user at 24.57.16.53
- You go in and fix it, which I just did. PKT 14:25, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- I think the above poster was also referring to all ad-copy intro, which had nothing to do with the school's reputation. I removed it entirely. 24.57.1.51
pro-Windsor?
This whole page seems to be quite pro-Windsor, and although I'm sure we are all proud of our university, let's be a little levelheaded here. The bias seeps through. -- unsigned comment was posted at 16:56, 2007 March 16 by anonymous user at 72.38.232.164
Law school's section removed
An anonymous editor who actually must have been using an on campus Leddy Library computer some of the time (I can tell becuase if you look at their 'Contrib' History it lists a 2005 year series edit to my User Page which I quite clearly remember making because someone thought I was insenstive for the caption under a picture of 2 guinea pigs) has written a large chunk about the law school. It reads like an officially approved blurb from an LSAT publication. I took it out since I think others already expressed it is too POV and kind of off-key with the other content in the sense there is too much detail for law and not enough for the other faculities listed. Whoever wrote it, why not start a seperate article about the law school and expand what is written in a more neutral tone?--Mikerussell 05:30, 27 March 2007 (UTC)