Talk:United Nations General Assembly Resolution 273

The external links seem to be broken. There's already a link in the top frame to the document in unispal.un.org, so perhaps they are obsolete. Dorshil (talk) 11:29, 20 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on United Nations General Assembly Resolution 273. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Two unverified quotes in the "Debates and Discussions"

edit

Both of the quotes are linked to an incomplete short citation "Boyle & 279-80".

None of them can be found in the linked protocols of the General Assembly meeting, so the accuracy of the quotes cannot be verified.

I suggest that either the citation should be corrected to a long citation, so the quotes authenticity could be confirmed, or the whole section removed. Zlmark (talk) 16:57, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Voting Results Map Error

edit

The voting results map does not reflect the fact China was one of the countries that voted for the resolution. Raven9nine (talk) 21:04, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Misleading partial quotes in the "Debates and Discussions" section

edit

The whole section has been formulated in way that gives a mistaken impression that Israel agreed to the return of Arab refugees. The response of the Israeli representative, Abba Eban, is truncated and leaves out the sentence that follows:

"I cannot honestly conceal from the Committee that even our full co-operation with all the means at our disposal will not avail to solve this question unless it is considered against the general background of the Near East and unless similar co-operation from other neighboring Governments and a large measure of international assistance are invested in the solution of this problem on a regional basis."

Moreover, later in the same session Eban says:

"The Government of Israel considers and has made it clear that the return of Arab refugees was one of the methods of settling this problem. It considers, as the Conciliation Commission considers and as one of the Governments represented in the United Nations, the opinion of which I quoted this morning seems also to consider, that another method of settling the question would be resettlement of the refugees in neighboring countries. The balance of those resettled in neighboring countries, in comparison with the numbers resettled in Israel, is a matter to be settled by mutual consent after negotiations for which we are immediately prepared."

https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-185978/

And, following this response, the representative of Yemen states in the next session on May 7:

"Mr. Eban has further confirmed that his Government considered resettlement of the refugees in the neighboring Arab States the main basis of any solution."

https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-189757/

Accordingly, this section needs to be either thoroughly rewritten or removed altogether, since it present form it gives a distorted view of only one aspect of the discussions.


Zlmark (talk) 07:38, 3 November 2024 (UTC)Reply