This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The history section needs changes. For starters a substantial expansion, so it can seamlessly land into recent developments without balance issues. Expecting that most of the content can only appear in the "see also" links does this article no good at all. The tiny paragraph about the period the UK was a EU member state could use a less "navel-gazing" approach: it currently focus on the internal ideological cleavage in the UK. It does not pay any mention whatsoever to the role of the UK in the EU (regarding the Common Agrarian Policy, further integration, the UK rebate, EU enlargement, Common Foreign Policy et. al... anything other than the non-membership in Schengen). Besides, that the only subsection depending on the history section is titled after a future prospect is odd to say the least.--Asqueladd (talk) 16:04, 9 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}