Talk:Unaffiliated voter
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Does anyone think this page sounds a lot more like a motivational speech than a Wikipedia article? It is incredibly biased, especially with the author's use of "we." Example: "While you will find us in all walks of life, ethnic backgrounds and social movements, the majority of us are the Real American Middle Class." I mean, come on. If that's not pure opinion, I don't know what is. Lcduke 19:09, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Looks like the specific instances of 'we' have been removed, but I agree, it remains extremely POV and non-encyclopedic. I've thrown in some [citation needed] tags, moved around some content, and put some of the more objectionable POV into comment tags... ``T. S. Rice 00:53, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
December 08
editAlot of people don't realize that unaffiliated voter are frauds, most of them are associated with a political party but choose not to stand under its label. Waterjuice (talk) 04:34, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
bogus website
editIt is not clear to me why this page is not rolled into Independent_(voter) or else identified as specifically USA and linked from there as a "main page".
The external link to http://unaffiliated.us/ appears to be bogus URL (i.e., a page devoid of relevant content, being a blank wordpress blog page for some 3-4 months with no past entries as of this date 2010-02-15.) Not one of the other external links at Independent_(voter) is at this page, which is immediately suspect.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Grshiplett (talk • contribs) 23:02, 15 February 2010 (UTC)