Talk:Ultraman Tiga (character)/GA1

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Mike Christie in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 17:41, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 17:41, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • The non-free picture in the infobox is displayed at much higher resolution than is appropriate for a fair use image.
  • There are nine non-free images; I find it very hard to believe we really need all of these, especially as they're all used for similar purposes: to display the look of the character or related characters.
  • There are quite a few dead links: see here.
  • There are two harv errors in the footnotes; you can see them by installing this script.
  • The bibliography and footnotes should include English translations of the titles.
  • I would strongly suggest eliminating much of the inline Japanese in the lead, and in fact it would make the article much more readable if the Japanese text could be put in footnotes.
  • The article is largely written from an in-universe perspective, which makes it much less accessible to a reader unfamiliar with the works involved.
  • Quite a bit of copyediting is needed. Some examples, just from the lead and first paragraph:
    • The first sentence has three consecutive subsidiary clauses depending on the previous one; not very readable.
    • "laid a huge impact"
    • "Tiga's first archetypal design was made in a form of a clay statue"
    • "Also the original setting for the pyramid was supposedly to house five instead of three Ultras, with two statues being destroyed and the other two merged with Tiga to bestow him his Type Change abilities."
    • "The crystal on his forehead was meant as a trademark to reflect the sunlight during lighting effect."
    • "One of his NG design was recycled"

I have a hard time believing that these issues can be fixed in a reasonable time frame, but you've waited a long time for this review, so I'll wait for you to respond and then decide whether to fail it. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 23:57, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Zero stylinx: are you planning to work on this? If not I'll close this after another week. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:20, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Close it if you will.Zero stylinx (talk) 04:42, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
OK. Failing GA for the reasons given above. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:16, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply