Talk:USS West Carnifax/GA1

GA Review

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up within a couple of hours. Dana boomer (talk) 18:40, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Everything looks good, so I am passing this article to GA status. Two comments for you to consider:

• Do your sources say how this ship managed to be rammed by two others? This seems rather remarkable.
• The lead probably doesn't need to be quite this long for an article of this length. Not a huge deal, but you could probably trim it a bit.

These two things aren't going to hold up the GA promotion, though, so congrats, and nice work on another good article! Dana boomer (talk) 19:03, 9 September 2008 (UTC)