Talk:USS Massachusetts (BB-2)/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Parsecboy in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk) 20:24, 26 July 2010 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    Conversion needed for the displacement figure in the infobox (and specify what type of ton is being used)
      Done Yoenit (talk) 11:11, 6 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    What makes museuminthesea.com reliable?
    It's the official site of the Florida Underwater Archaeological Preserves and run by the Florida State government. Yoenit (talk) 11:11, 6 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
    Odd that it's not .gov then. Parsecboy (talk) 11:22, 6 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    File:Massachusetts.jpg needs a proper source showing date of publication or death-date of the author to prove that it's PD in the US.
    I have mailed the webmaster of Maritime quest with a request for more information, will post again once I know more Yoenit (talk) 11:11, 6 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
    As I have received no response yet I decided to use another picture for the infobox, a color painting. Yoenit (talk) 21:24, 12 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Excellent work so far, there are just a few issues that need to be addressed before the article meets the GA criteria. Parsecboy (talk) 20:24, 26 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
    Alright then, everything looks fine now. Parsecboy (talk) 13:59, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply