Talk:Tupaia miocenica/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Visionholder in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: – VisionHolder « talk » 23:31, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)

Another excellent, short article about an extinct animal known from a single tooth. I didn't spot any problems on the read-through.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    N/A
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Good job! – VisionHolder « talk » 23:43, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply