Talk:TrueCrypt/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on TrueCrypt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.securstar.com/faq_drivecrypt.php
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://sourceforge.net/projects/truecrypt/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://opencryptoaudit.org/
• Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.grc.com/misc/truecrypt/truecrypt.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/30/us-usa-security-snowden-nytimes-idUSBRE97T0RC20130830
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://auerfeld.wordpress.com/2013/08/31/miranda-where-is-the-uk-government-getting-its-numbers-from/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2014/02/true_crypt_software_that_hides.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029185711/http://projects.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss/2013-October/001313.html to http://projects.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss/2013-October/001313.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for https://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/status/478721271316758528

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:50, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Spelling

If a source uses the term "Truecrypt",[1] should we correct it to read "TrueCrypt"? What if the source uses "TRUECRYPT"?[2][3] Should we say that the source calls it "TRUECRYPT", "Truecrypt", or "TrueCrypt"? I am leaning towards always using "TrueCrypt". (See MOS:CAMELCASE for guidance). Also note that the last known developer called it "truecrypt" in response to an inquiry that called it "Truecrypt",[4] but the official website calls it "TrueCrypt".[5] --Guy Macon (talk) 18:48, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Guy

The Arbitration Committee has ruled that editors should not change an article from one styling to another without "substantial reason". "TrueCrypt" has been the dominant spelling in this article for a very long time and changing the case of "C" is a matter of optional style. All you have to do is to make sure it is consistently used. Changing "C" to "c" is really a color of the bike shed issue.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 07:40, 3 September 2017 (UTC)